The distribution of mutations in an error prone library has been modelled in Sun (1995) based on the underlying principle of a PCR reaction. In the paper it is found that the distribution becomes more and more similar to a regular Possion and the two are virtually the same after 10 cycles. However, given that one most likely does not know what one's PCR efficiency is, using this formula may be dangerous. Whereas in reality getting a better estimate of the mean number of mutations may be more helpful.
A segfault and NaN driven series of disconnected ideas, analyses and just plain silly posts about computational biochemistry, synthetic biology and microbiology.
Showing posts with label epPCR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label epPCR. Show all posts
Saturday, 25 August 2018
Saturday, 6 January 2018
Skewed mutational biases: English scrabble with Klingon tiles
Skewed mutational biases: English scrabble with Klingon tiles
In a game of Scrabble one draws seven tiles from a bag and the best results are found when a bag and the language used match. In library making with error-prone PCR one does not have that luxury, but different methods differing degrees of fairness. Mutazyme is like playing in English with a Latin tile set, while manganese Taq with equal nucleotides is like playing in English with a Klingon tile set.Wednesday, 5 July 2017
In vivo shuffling via heteroduplex amplicons
![]() |
| Bluescreen transilluminator photo showing different shades of green. |
I did a sneaky experiment to see if this could be used to make protocol to shuffle mutations between variants and got a positive result, but possibly not as effective as hoped.
Labels:
DNA,
E. coli,
epPCR,
error prone PCR,
evolution,
fluorescence,
idea
Sunday, 23 April 2017
A note on Mutazyme and Manganese
Can Mutazyme be powered up?
Adding manganese works poorly, but stronger variants seem to be known.
(see also discussion about Mutazyme in Part I and II)
Adding manganese works poorly, but stronger variants seem to be known.
(see also discussion about Mutazyme in Part I and II)
Wednesday, 30 November 2016
On error rates of Mutazyme
On a previous jocular post about the 'not for diagnostic purposes' tag on Mutazyme I mention the mutational rate of Mutazyme II. The exact mutations per kb per doubling is never mentioned in the manual, but can be extrapolated. (see also part III: Mutazyme and Manganese)
Saturday, 12 November 2016
The heteroduplicity of error prone PCR plasmids
![]() |
A mix of wt and
mutant...
|
Thursday, 25 February 2016
Medical diagnosis with Mutazyme
A cornerstone enzyme for error-prone PCR is Mutazyme, an enzyme with an increase error rate, but less biased than manganese mutagenesis. The manual is very clear and the only major annoyance is that it implicitly says that it makes 1.3 mutations per kb per cycle —that is the log2 of the fold amplification of the target—, whereas it actually makes something around 0.9 mutations per kb per cycle —even with the assumption that no DNA is lost during spin column purification or that DNA cut out of an agarose gel is not shockingly dirty.
However, the biggest mystery is that it says "Not for medical diagnostics".
However, the biggest mystery is that it says "Not for medical diagnostics".
Sunday, 1 March 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

